Optim Finance
  • INTRODUCTION
    • Introduction
    • Roadmap
  • OADA
    • Overview
    • OADA 🟣 and sOADA 🟢
    • Flow of Funds
    • User Guides
      • Passive yield with sOADA
      • Epoch Stake Auction
    • AMOs
      • Splash DEX AMO
      • Stake Auction AMO
      • Staking AMO
    • UNHCR Donation Module
      • Automated Yield Donation Protocol
      • NFT Impact Certificate
      • Integration with the OADA Ecosystem
      • Humanitarian Partnership
      • Future Extensions
    • Governance
    • Resources
  • OTOKEN Framework
    • Introduction
      • Key Benefits
      • Who is it for?
      • Inspirations & Applications
    • Framework
      • Key Concepts
      • Use Cases
      • OTOKENs
    • Core Concepts
      • OTOKEN and sOTOKEN
      • Algorithmic Market Operations (AMOs)
      • Balancing Stability, Yield, and Adaptability
    • System Architecture
      • OTOKEN Policy
      • Staking AMO
      • Collateral Management AMO
    • Extensions & Other Modules
      • DEX AMO (Liquidity & Peg Stability)
      • Stake Auction AMO
      • Borrowing & Lending AMOs
      • Other AMOs & Opportunities
    • Multiple OTOKEN Deployments
      • Ecosystem Synergy
      • Not Just Synthetic Assets
    • Vision
      • Key Pillars of the OToken Framework
      • Future Directions & Opportunities
      • An Invitation to Innovate
    • Bug Bounty Program
  • LIQUIDITY BONDS
    • Overview
    • Bond App FAQ
    • Use Cases
      • ISPO Bonds
      • SPO Bonds
    • Bond Architecture
      • Validators
      • High Level Workflow
      • Scripts Technical
      • Transaction Flow
      • Pooled Loans
    • Guides for SPOs
      • Bond Creation
      • Bond Sales
      • SPO Bond Issue Summary
      • Bond Verification
    • Liquidity Bonds Audit
  • OUSD
    • OUSD Reserves
      • Reserve Criteria
        • Stability and Reputation
        • Compliance
        • Smart Contract Security
    • Ongoing Reserves Management
      • Reserve Asset Valuation Calculation
      • Dynamic Reserve Asset Adjustment Metrics
        • Dynamic Reserves Adjustment
    • Yield, Staking, and Flow of Funds
      • Yield Modules
        • OUSD DEX AMO
        • Future Modules (v2)
      • Staking AMO
      • sOUSD Redemption Mechanism
    • Peg Protection
      • Market Depth and Liquidity
    • Governance and Risk Framework
      • Risk Capital Requirements
      • First-Loss Capital Structure
      • Asset Allocation Framework
        • Static Governance Parameters
        • Dynamic Allocation System
    • Financial Engineering Audit
  • Leviathan
    • System Architecture
      • Background
      • Concurrency Limitations
      • Complexity in Transaction and Contract Management
    • Core Concepts
      • Deterministic Transaction
        • Guaranteed Transaction
      • Instant Finality
        • Liveness and Safety
        • Probabilistic Finality vs Instant Finality
      • Account Abstraction
        • Concept of Account Abstraction
        • Technical Implementation
        • Security and Operational Implications
      • Intent Based Transactions
        • The Infrastructure and Process of IBTs
        • Declarative Constraints in IBTs
      • Layer 2
        • Types of Layer 2 Solutions
      • Sequencers
        • Core Functions of Sequencers
        • Role in Layer 2 Rollups
        • Challenges
    • System Components
      • Understanding the System Components
      • Optim-Account (Intents to enable tx chain)
        • User Interaction and Intent Submission
        • Intent Structuring and Authentication
        • Smart Contract Functionalities and Operational Parameters
        • The Necessity of an Account-Based Framework
        • Account Abstraction and Its Role in Leviathan
      • Leviathan Sequencer System (tx chain building)
        • The Role of the Leviathan Sequencer System in Conjunction with The Optim Account
        • Sequencing and Ordering of Transactions
        • The Role of Time in the System
        • The Pragmatic Leviathan: Dealing with Potential Changes
      • The Role of OADA in the Leviathan System
        • Operational Simplification of Staking Mechanisms via OADA Integration
        • Facilitating Time Dilation and Composability
    • Processes
      • Entering Leviathan
      • Transaction Execution
      • Leaving Leviathan
    • High Level Overview
      • System Design
        • Account Abstraction Functionality
        • Guaranteed Transactions
        • Instant Finality
        • Unbreakable Transaction Chaining
        • Layer 2 Execution Environment
        • Future Sequencer Network
      • System Context
        • Limitations of current transactions chaining paradigm
        • Limitations of current inter dApp composability issues
        • Explanation of basic design and non-custodial asset inputs
        • Intent Based Transactions
        • Account Base vs eUTxO model app architecture
      • Theoretical Applications
  • GOVERNANCE
    • Governance Overview
      • Proposal Temp Check
      • Governance Proposal
        • On/Off Chain Mechanics
      • ODAO
    • Tokenomics
      • Categories
      • Vesting
    • Optim DAO Wallets
    • Protocol Profits
  • GUIDES
    • Transaction Chaining
      • Background
      • Overview
      • Pool Transaction Chaining
    • OPTIMiz Conversion
  • ODAO Stack
    • Introduction
    • Design Principles
    • Why Optim DAO Stack?
      • Current Limitations
      • ODAO Solutions
    • Key Features
      • Snapshot Voting
      • Treasury Management
      • Proposal Execution
    • System Architecture
      • Modular Framework
      • On-Chain Logic
      • Off-Chain Operations
      • User Interfaces
    • Core Modules
      • Snapshot Voting Module
      • Treasury Management Module
      • Proposal Execution Module
    • Future Roadmap
      • Potential Future Enhancements
      • Long Term Vision
  • OADA UI
    • Setup
      • Installation
      • Development Workflow
      • Troubleshooting
      • Development Tips
      • Open Source Contributions
      • FAQ
    • Key Functionalities
      • Wallet Integration
      • Dashboard
      • Transaction Management
        • UTxO Management
        • Transaction Creation and Conversion
        • Transaction Monitoring
      • Real-time Updates
        • Portfolio Value Tracking
        • Transaction Status Monitoring
    • OADA Smart Contract API
      • Minting OADA
      • Staking OADA
      • Unstaking sOADA
      • Epoch Stake Auction
        • Bid Calculation Functions
        • Auction Actions
        • Bid Form Component
        • Auction Dashboard
    • Tutorials
      • Environment Setup and Installation
      • Understanding the Project Structure
      • Basic Configuration and Customization
      • Working with Components
      • State Management and Data Flow
      • Wallet Integration and State Management
      • Smart Contract Integration
      • Advanced UI Customization
      • Testing and Quality Assurance
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • OADA Peg Protection
  • Depegged below Target Price
  • Depegged above Target Price
  • Exiting the OADA System
  1. OADA
  2. AMOs

Splash DEX AMO

PreviousAMOsNextStake Auction AMO

Last updated 10 months ago

The Splash DEX AMO is one of the core components of the OADA system. It's utility is threefold in that it maintains a strong peg, provides users with the mechanism to exit their OADA positions, and generates yield for sOADA holders.

OADA Peg Protection

The Splash DEX AMO maintains its peg within a one percent range (0.99-1.01) by buying OADA with ADA reserves, or minting OADA and selling it. As users buy or sell OADA into the pool, the price will fluctuate and the system will respond to any depegs accordingly.

Depegged below Target Price

If OADA is trading below the peg, the system can swap 1 ADA from reserves for slightly more than 1 OADA due to price discrepancy, thereafter burning the excess OADA. This transaction results in balancing of the peg higher and OADA exiting the system, increasing the ratio of assets to liabilities and thereby increasing yield for sOADA holders.

Depegged above Target Price

Conversely, when OADA trades above the peg, the system can mint new OADA to sell into the pool and balance the peg lower. This is possible as long as the amount of ADA coming in is greater than the amount of OADA minted. The difference between those two is the system profit. This can be thought of as a round-about way to mint OADA. Periodically, the system will also rebalance the pool ratio to maintain peg by adding and removing liquidity. The system adds liquidity by freely minting new OADA to pair with ADA reserves, resulting in a ~2x leveraged liquidity position at no cost to the system. Eventually the system will remove this liquidity, burn the excess OADA, and tally profits from the pool before deploying liquidity again.

Exiting the OADA System

Users exit their OADA position by swapping back to ADA on the Splash OADA/ADA Stableswap.

A simpler redemption mechanism would merely unwrap OADA back into the underlying ADA component while charging a flat fee for the service. While this approach might suffice, it requires manual governance updates and makes it difficult to find a consensus on a fee structure that is fair and equitable to positions of all sizes.

Accordingly, the DEX AMO can be conceptualized as a price discovery mechanism for the cost of exiting the system. The price impact of performing a swap represents the market value for exchanging the two assets and can be thought of as the fair price for exiting the system at any given size. This means that the "fee" to exit the system is minimal for small positions and greater for larger ones.

By leveraging the DEX AMO, the system benefits from a market-driven approach to managing exits, which is both efficient and fair. This mechanism ensures that small transactions remain low-cost while larger transactions bear higher costs, proportionate to their impact on the liquidity pool. This structure not only maintains the peg but also contributes to the profitability and stability of the OADA ecosystem.